Views: 82333 | Comments: 7

World Trade Center 7 Pictures, Images and Photos

Then ask yourselves this: How could the BBC, in this live report run a crawl across the screen that World Trade Center 7 had collapsed when it’s still standing in the background? Who was it that actually knew it was going to come down later? (BELOW) Keep this in mind also, only 5% of the American people know that THREE skyscrapers were brought down on 9/11! Most don’t know that World Trade Center 1 and World Trade Center 2 AND World Trade Center 7, were all brought down that day by a controlled demolition!





Your countrymen have been murdered and the more you delve into it the more proof there is they were murdered by your/our government, who used it as an excuse to murder other people thousands of miles away. If you ridicule others who have sincere doubts and who know factual information that directly contradicts the official report and who want explanations from those who hold the keys to our government and have motive, means, and opportunity to pull off a 9/11 but you are too lazy or fearful to check into the facts yourself, what does that make you? Once again, we are NOT presenting you “conspiracy theories”....WE ARE PRESENTING YOU, CONSPIRACY FACTS!!!!!

One would think that if a handful of Arabs managed to outwit not merely the CIA and FBI but all 16 US intelligence agencies, all intelligence agencies of our allies including Mossad, the National Security Council, the State Department, NORAD, airport security four times on one morning, air traffic control, etc., the President and Congress, the media would be demanding to know how such an improbable event could occur. Instead, the White House put up a wall of resistance to finding out, and Congress and the media showed little interest.

Hummmm, wonder why the major News agencies didn’t pick up the story below? —

Explosives Found in

World Trade Center Dust:

Scientists Discover Both Residues

And Unignited Fragments

of Nano-Engineered Thermitic Pyrotechnics

In Debris From the Twin Towers


Posted on April 6, 2009 —

A ground-breaking scientific paper confirmed this week that red-gray flakes found throughout multiple samples of WTC dust are actually unexploded fragments of nanothermite, an exotic high-tech explosive.

The samples were taken from far-separated locations in Manhattan, some as early as 10 minutes after the second tower (WTC 1) collapsed, ruling out any possible contamination from cleanup operations.

Authored by an international team of physicists, chemists, and others, the research paper was titled “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe.” It was published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, Vol. 2., and is available online for free download. The lead author is Niels H. Harrit of the Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen.

The paper ends with the statement, “Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.”

Ordinary thermite burns quickly and can melt through steel, but it is not explosive. Nanothermite, however, can be formulated as a high explosive. It is stable when wet and can be applied like paint.

The presence of pre-planted explosives in the WTC buildings calls into question the official story that the buildings were destroyed by the airplane collisions and fire alone. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the official government agency that investigated the building collapses, did not test for residues of explosives.

Richard Gage, AIA, said, “This peer-reviewed scientific study of the disturbing contents of the WTC dust is yet another smoking gun proving to the over 600 Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) who I represent that a real investigation must be carried out immediately as to the actual cause of the destruction of the 3 WTC high-rises on 9/11.”

The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009,

These buildings fell in exactly the same manner as a building falls which has been professionally imploded. Instead of falling down in chunky pieces and probably sideways which would have been expected had the government story actually been true, these two towers fell straight down in their “footprint” and all that steel and concrete dissolved into dust!

Physics fails to substantiate the government’s official position that the buildings fell because they were struck by commercial airliners! This DVD, “9/11: DIRECTOR’S CUT In Plane Site” has proven the most important, and popular, of the videos produced on the attacks of 9/11. You will see some really startling truths: 1) Why did a FOX News employee report seeing no windows on Flight 175?, calling the plane NOT a commercial jetliner?

2) What is that pod underneath belly of both airliners crashing into WTC and did the pod cause the flash of fire just before airliner hit? 3) Listen to NYC firefighters describe the explosions they saw and heard just before WTC collapsed; 4) If both towers are still standing, what caused the huge explosion at the base of the WTC complex? Never before reported phenomenon; 5) The Physics of the Pentagon strike simply do not match up at all, plus TV feed showing onlooker saying he had seen a cruise missile strike the Pentagon; 6) Convincing evidence that planes hitting WTC were remote controlled using proven Pentagon capability; 7) Excellent feed of Oklahoma City bombing showing TV news clips where news anchors are talking about bombs going off and other bombs found, inside Murrah Building.

In fact, the entire government lie about the attacks on 9/11 revolve around the incredible statement which government investigators told eyewitnesses to the Oklahoma City Bombing: “You did not see what you think you saw”!

On the movie, “The Truman Show”, the creator was asked why Truman never thought to challenge the reality of his life. The Director chillingly said, “People tend to accept the reality as it is presented to them”.

Truer words have never been spoken. Now you know the propaganda principle upon which the attacks of 9/11.

By Greg Szymanski

There was no fooling former Air Force and commercial pilot Russ Wittenberg the morning of 9/11. He knew it was an inside job from the get-go, knowing the ‘big boys’ were up to the same dirty tricks they played in the Kennedy assassination and Pearl Harbor.

The government may have fooled millions of Americans with its cockamamie official story, but the former fighter pilot who flew over 100 combat missions in Vietnam and who sat for 35 years in the cockpit for Pan Am and United, wasn’t one of them.

Now, almost four years later, Wittenberg is still shaking his head in disbelief more than ever, saying the country he loved and fought so bravely 40 years ago has fallen in the deep, dark and sinister hands of fascist leaders who are quickly turning America into a military state. Although back in the beginning he seemed like a lone wolf in the hen house, he’s noticed, especially in the last six months, more Americans waking up to the cold reality that the U.S. government staged 9/1l, started an illegal war in Iraq and basically is criminally responsible for killing hundreds of thousands of innocent lives here and abroad.

Even though it’s a hard pill for some to swallow, Wittenberg says Americans need to “wake up and wake up fast,” holding those in government responsible even though it may mean a total makeover of the American political system. And for these despicable actions now taking place in the name of freedom, the former F-100 Vietnam fighter pilot, who knows what it’s like to be in harms way, directed a little military jab toward the Commander and Chief, saying: “Oh, why doesn’t he wake up and just fall on his sword.”

Talking about his obvious disgust for the Bush administration, he bundles 9/11 into the neo con’s “neat little contrived war package,” saying it was the lynch pin needed to usher in a state of constant fear, a climate of war and a perfect setting for the unconstitutional Patriot Act and eventual martial law.

“If you would have told me back in the 1970s this was going to happen to America, I would have never imagined it. It’s just not the same country I grew up in as all our Constitutional freedoms are being stripped away right before our very eyes,” said Wittenberg in a telephone conversation from his home in Carefree Az., a picturesque and serene place on the map near Scottsdale. “The government story they handed us about 9/11 is total B.S. plain and simple. I also thoroughly went over the recent 9/11 Commission report, finding about 110 outright lies and numerous other half-truths and omissions in an obvious cover-up of not only the truth but of a criminal investigation.

“Condaleeza Rice lied through her teeth when she testified and if I would have had her on the stand for 10 minutes, I would have had her in tears.”

Concerning 9/11, Wittenberg knew right off the bat the hijackers – who couldn’t handle a Piper Cub – couldn’t fly the ‘big birds” he flew for so many years, knowing the planes were also incapable of performing such high speed maneuvers as the government claimed. He also knew the possibility of jet fuel bringing down the towers made no sense. In fact, he knew the whole 9/11 story made about as much sense as crossing the Atlantic in a row boat.

And right after 9/11 when it was unpopular and considered almost treasonous to question the government, Wittenberg became the first commercial airline pilot with experience flying the jets used in 9/11 to publicly denounce the government story.

Although speaking publicly on many occasions about the fictitious government account of 9/11, it wasn’t until Sept. 16, 2004, his controversial remarks aired on Wing TV, sparking a heated debate among pilots and others clinging to the flimsy government account.

Knowing the flight characteristics of the “big birds” like the back of his hand, Wittenberg convincingly argued there was absolutely no possibility that Flight 77could have “descended 7,000 feet in two minutes, all the while performing a steep 270 degree banked turn before crashing into the Pentagon’s first floor wall without touching the lawn.”

Wittenberg claimed the high speed maneuver would have surely stalled the jetliner sending it into a nose dive, adding it was “totally impossible for an amateur who couldn’t even fly a Cessna to maneuver the jetliner in such a highly professional manner, something Wittenberg said he couldn’t do with 35 years of commercial jetliner experience.

“For a guy to just jump into the cockpit and fly like an ace is impossible – there is not one chance in a thousand,” said Wittenberg, recalling that when he made the jump from Boeing 727’s to the highly sophisticated computerized characteristics of the 737’s through 767’s it took him considerable time to feel comfortable flying.

“I had to be trained to use the new, computerized systems. I just couldn’t jump in and fly one,” he added. Finding more inconsistencies with the government story about Flight 77, Wittenberg recalled the recent statements made by a flight controller on an ABC 20/20 television program three months ago.

“If you listened to her carefully only an experienced pilot probably would have known that what she was saying was scripted,” said Wittenberg. “Remember the transponder was turned off on Flight 77 and when this occurs, all the particular flight data like air speed and even the plane’s flight identification goes with it.

“All that’s left on the controller’s screen is a green blip, that’s it. But here you have this flight controller on 20/20 saying she was tracking the flight with specific air speed and other coordinates which was totally impossible once the transponder was turned off. How would she even have known the flight number? The whole story is a pack of lies and this is just another example.” And from the moment Wittenberg called attention to the lies, he’s been in the cross hairs defending his story, defending it by using a little bit of psychology, a lot of history and asking critics to answer questions before drawing conclusions.

“I’ve learned over the years, it’s hard to change anybody’s mind when they really aren’t listening,” said Wittenberg. “So, I just decided to fire back a lot of questions to those people who believe the government story.

“I ask them explain how Building No.7 collapsed? I ask them why haven’t the “black boxes” been recovered? I ask them to explain how jet fuel – fuel that burns cold not hot—could bring down two high rise structures when more than 90% of the fuel on board burned outside the buildings?”

And Wittenberg has hundreds of other tough questions ready, but said it’s also important to put 9/11 and the Iraq war in a historical prospective.

“Is 9/11 and the phony war on terror any different or more serious than Pearl Harbor and World War II?,” asks Wittenberg. “The bottom line is all wars are contrived and it is these rich bankers and financiers who have pulled the strings and who have put these contrived events like 9/11 and Pearl Harbor into motion.”


AUSTIN, Texas, April 3 (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE)— Former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura blasted the official 9/11 story – citing that evidence disproves the government’s claims that jet fuel melted the Twin Towers’ steel girders.

“How could those buildings fall at the speed of gravity – if you put a stopwatch on them both of those World Trade Center buildings were on the ground in ten seconds – how can that be?” asked Ventura. “Never before in the annals of history has a fire caused a steel structure building to fall to the ground like these two did.”

Ventura said he was convinced the collapses of the towers and WTC Building 7 were too similar to the controlled demolition of Las Vegas hotels. Ventura has experience with explosives from Basic Underwater Demolition SEAL training and believes unequivocally the buildings were deliberately imploded.

“I was on the site within two weeks after it happened and I saw none of these pancakes – wouldn’t they all be piled up in a huge mass on the ground and yet everything was blown into dust – when you look at it from that aspect none of it makes any sense,”

Ventura expressed regret that he had initially believed the official story because he could have used his power as governor to raise pointed questions in the media.

“I kicked myself when it initially happened that the light didn’t go off but I was so shocked that this thing had even taken place that I apologize for not being more aware,” said Ventura, adding that watching Loose Change at the insistence of his son was part of the catalyst for his wake up call.

The Governor’s bold comments about 9/11 come on the heels of similar views expressed by American icon Willie Nelson during an interview on the same radio show in February.

When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. This short video tells it all: —

Electric Green Divider

Need more proof? Here’s EYEWITNESS testimony offering further proof of explosions in the Twin Towers

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

“[T]here was just an explosion [in the south tower]. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions.”-FIREFIGHTER RICHARD BANACISKI

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

“I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building?” -ASSISTANT FIRE COMMISSIONER STEPHEN GREGORY

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

“[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear ‘Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop’.” -PARAMEDIC DANIEL RIVERA

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

FDNY CAPTAIN DENNIS TARDIO, speaking of the south tower, said: “I hear an explosion and I look up. It is as if the building is being imploded, from the top floor down, one after another, boom, boom, boom.”

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

In June of 2002, NBC television played segments from tapes recorded on 9/11. One segment contained the following exchange, which involved firefighters in the south tower:

Official: Battalion 3 to dispatch, we’ve just had another explosion. Official: Battalion 3 to dispatch, we’ve had additional explosion. Dispatcher: Received battalion command. Additional explosion.

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

Firefighter LOUIE CACCHIOLI, after entering the north tower lobby and seeing elevator doors completely blown out and people being hit with debris, asked himself, “how could this be happening so quickly if a plane hit way above”? After he reached the 24th floor, he and another fireman “heard this huge explosion that sounded like a bomb [and] knocked off the lights and stalled the elevator.” After they pried themselves out of the elevator, “another huge explosion like the first one hits. This one hits about two minutes later . . . [and] I’m thinking, “Oh. My God, these bastards put bombs in here”

Electric Green Divider

Here are Prominent Structural Engineers who say the official Version of 9/11 is “Impossible” “Defies Common Logic” and “Violates the Law of Physics”

Numerous structural engineers now publicly challenge the government’s account of the destruction of the Trade Centers on 9/11, including:

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

Two professors of structural engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (Dr. JOERG SCHNEIDER AND DR. HUGO BACHMANN) said that, on 9/11, World Trade Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition.

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

KAMAL S. OBEID, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering from UC Berkeley, of Fremont, California, says:

“Photos of the steel, evidence about how the buildings collapsed, the unexplainable collapse of WTC 7, evidence of thermite in the debris as well as several other red flags, are quite troubling indications of well planned and controlled demolition”

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

RONALD H. BROOKMAN, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering from UC Davis, of Novato California, writes:

“Why would all 110 stories drop straight down to the ground in about 10 seconds, pulverizing the contents into dust and ash – twice. Why would all 47 stories of WTC 7 fall straight down to the ground in about seven seconds the same day? It was not struck by any aircraft or engulfed in any fire. An independent investigation is justified for all three collapses including the surviving steel samples and the composition of the dust.”

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

GRAHAM JOHN INMAN, structural engineer, of London, England, points out:

“WTC 7 Building could not have collapsed as a result of internal fire and external debris. NO plane hit this building. This is the only case of a steel frame building collapsing through fire in the world. The fire on this building was small & localized therefore what is the cause?”

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

PAUL W. MASON, structural engineer, of Melbourne, Australia, argues:

“In my view, the chances of the three buildings collapsing symmetrically into their own footprint, at freefall speed, by any other means than by controlled demolition, are so remote that there is no other plausible explanation!”

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

DAVID SCOTT, Structural Engineer, of Scotland, argues: “Near-freefall collapse violates laws of physics. Fire induced collapse is not consistent with observed collapse mode . . . .”

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

NATHAN LOMBA, Structural Engineer, of Eureka, California, states

“I began having doubts about, so called, official explanations for the collapse of the WTC towers soon after the explanations surfaced. The gnawing question that lingers in my mind is: How did the structures collapse in near symmetrical fashion when the apparent precipitating causes were asymmetrical loading? The collapses defies common logic from an elementary structural engineering perspective. “If” you accept the argument that fire protection covering was damaged to such an extent that structural members in the vicinity of the aircraft impacts were exposed to abnormally high temperatures, and “if” you accept the argument that the temperatures were high enough to weaken the structural framing, that still does not explain the relatively concentric nature of the failures.

Neither of the official precipitating sources for the collapses, namely the burning aircraft, were centered within the floor plan of either tower; both aircraft were off-center when they finally came to rest within the respective buildings. This means that, given the foregoing assumptions, heating and weakening of the structural framing would have been constrained to the immediate vicinity of the burning aircraft. Heat transmission (diffusion) through the steel members would have been irregular owing to differing sizes of the individual members; and, the temperature in the members would have dropped off precipitously the further away the steel was from the flames—just as the handle on a frying pan doesn’t get hot at the same rate as the pan on the burner of the stove. These factors would have resulted in the structural framing furthest from the flames remaining intact and possessing its full structural integrity, i.e., strength and stiffness.

Structural steel is highly ductile, when subjected to compression and bending it buckles and bends long before reaching its tensile or shear capacity. Under the given assumptions, “if” the structure in the vicinity of either burning aircraft started to weaken, the superstructure above would begin to lean in the direction of the burning side. The opposite, intact, side of the building would resist toppling until the ultimate capacity of the structure was reached, at which point, a weak-link failure would undoubtedly occur. Nevertheless, the ultimate failure mode would have been a toppling of the upper floors to one side—much like the topping of a tall redwood tree—not a concentric, vertical collapse.

For this reason alone, I rejected the official explanation for the collapse of the WTC towers out of hand. Subsequent evidence supporting controlled, explosive demolition of the two buildings are more in keeping with the observed collapse modalities and only serve to validate my initial misgivings as to the causes for the structural failures.”

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

EDWARD E. KNESL, civil and structural engineer, of Phoenix, Arizona, writes: “We design and analyze buildings for the overturning stability to resist the lateral loads with the combination of the gravity loads. Any tall structure failure mode would be a fall over to its side. It is impossible that heavy steel columns could collapse at the fraction of the second within each story and subsequently at each floor below.

We do not know the phenomenon of the high rise building to disintegrate internally faster than the free fall of the debris coming down from the top.

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

The engineering science and the law of physics simply doesn’t know such possibility. Only very sophisticated controlled demolition can achieve such result, eliminating the natural dampening effect of the structural framing huge mass that should normally stop the partial collapse. The pancake theory is a fallacy, telling us that more and more energy would be generated to accelerate the collapse. Where would such energy would be coming from ?” DAVID TOPETE, civil and structural engineer, San Francisco, California.

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

Here’s other Structural Engineers who agree that Jet fuel DID NOT bring down the Twin Towers on 9/11 but were imploded with explosives already in the buildings:

CHARLES PEGELOW, structural engineer, of Houston, Texas

DENNIS WATERTON, structural engineer, of West Bend, Wisconsin

WILLIAM RICE, P.E., structural engineer, former professor of Vermont Technical College:

There are many other structural engineers who have questioned the government’s account in private. We support them and wish them courage to discuss these vital issues publicly which include:

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

MARX AYRES, A prominent engineer with 55 years experience, in charge of the design of hundreds of major building projects including high rise offices, former member of the California Seismic Safety Commission and former member of the National Institute of Sciences Building Safety Council believes that the World Trade Centers were brought down by controlled demolition.

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

MILLS M. KAY MACKEY, structural engineer, of Denver, Colorado, points out: “The force from the jets and the burning fuel could not have been sufficient to make the building collapse. Why doesn’t the media mention that the 11th floor was completely immolated on February 13th, 1975? It had the weight of nearly 100 stories on top of it but it did not collapse?”

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

DWAIN A. DEETS, Former Director for Research, Director for Aeronautical Projects, and Flight Research Program Manager for NASA’s Dryden Flight Research Center, who holds masters degrees in both physics and engineering says:

“The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Centers on 9/11].’‘

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

DR. STEVEN E. JONES, A prominent physicist, former U.S. professor of physics and a former principal investigator for the U.S. Department of Energy, Division of Advanced Energy Projects stated that the world trade centers were brought down by controlled demolition

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

DR. CROKETT GRABBE, a U.S. physics professor who teaches at several universities believes that the World Trade Centers were brought down by controlled demolition

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

Danish physicist BENT LUND, an expert on demolition said that the trade centers were brought down with explosives.

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

DANNY JOWENKO, A Dutch demolition expert stated that WTC 7 was imploded.

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

DR. HEIKKI KURTTILA, a safety engineer and accident analyst for the Finnish National Safety Technology Authority stated regarding WTC 7 that “The great speed of the collapse and the low value of the resistance factor strongly suggest controlled demolition.”

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

DR. JOEL S. HIRSCHHORN, a 13-year professor of metallurgical engineering at a U.S. university, with a PhD in materials engineering, a former Congressional Office of Technology Assessment Senior Staff Member is calling for a new investigation of 9/11

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

DR NIELS HARIT, a Danish professor of chemistry said, in a mainstream Danish newspaper, “WTC7 collapsed exactly like a house of cards. If the fires or damage in one corner had played a decisive role, the building would have fallen in that direction. You don’t have to be a woodcutter to grasp this.”

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

DR. BRUCE R. HENRY, a former guidance systems engineer for Polaris and Trident missiles and professor emeritus, mathematics and computer science at a university concluded that the Twin Towers “were brought down by planted explosives.”

Multicolor Flashing Bullet

EDWARD S. MUNYAK, a mechanical engineer with 20 years experience as a Fire Protection Engineer for the U.S. Departments of Energy, Defense, and Veterans Affairs, who is a contributing Subject Matter Expert to the U.S. Department of Energy Fire Protection Engineering Functional Area Qualification Standard for Nuclear Facilities, a board member of the Northern California – Nevada Chapter of the Society of Fire Protection Engineers, currently serving as Fire Protection Engineer for the city of San Jose, California, the 10th largest city in the United States believes that the World Trade Center was destroyed by controlled demolition.

ENVER MASUD, the former Chief of the Strategic and Emergency Planning Branch, U.S. Department of Energy, and former Director of the Office of Engineering at the Public Service Commission in Washington, D.C., who is a mechanical engineer does not believe the official story, and believes that there is a prima facie case for controlled demolition of the World Trade Center.

GARY WELZ, a professor of mathematics (Gary Welz) said “The official explanation that I’ve heard doesn’t make sense because it doesn’t explain why I heard and felt an explosion before the South Tower fell and why the concrete was pulverized”

The photo below shows how explosives are attached to a building. It is attached at an angle so when it is detonated, the steel columns collapse into each other.

In this photo you see a massive steel column at ground zero from the World Trade Center and you can a the column behind the worker is sliced at an angle which is exactly what is used in professional demolitions.

Patriots Question 9/11

We highly recommend the above website where you can read testimonies of:

190+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials, question 9/11

670+ Engineers and Architects, question 9/11

200+ Pilots and Aviation Professionals, question 9/11

400+ Professors Question 9/11

230+ 9/11 Survivors and Family Members, question 9/11

200+ Artists, Entertainers, and Media Professionals, question 9/11

All question the Official Story of 9/11:

Listen to Richard Gage who represents architects and engineers for 9/11 Truth, is interviewed on KMPH Fox 26 in Fresno, California, about the events of September 11, 2001. He has been an architect for over twenty years, and is experienced in steel structures.

When were the explosives planted? —

Marvin P. Bush, the president’s younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport. The company was backed by KuwAm, a Kuwaiti-American investment firm on whose board Marvin Bush also served. According to its present CEO, Barry McDaniel, the company had an ongoing contract to handle security at the World Trade Center “up to the day the buildings fell down.”

Marvin Bush

The company lists as government clients “the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S Air force, and the Department of Justice,” in projects that “often require state-of-the-art security solutions for classified or high-risk government sites.”

Stratesec (Securacom) differs from other security companies which separate the function of consultant from that of service provider. The company defines itself as a “single-source” provider of “end-to-end” security services, including everything from diagnosis of existing systems to hiring subcontractors to installing video and electronic equipment. It also provides armored vehicles and security guards.

The Dulles Internation contract is another matter. Dulles is regarded as “absolutely a sensitive airport,” according to security consultant Wayne Black, head of a Florida-based security firm, due to its location, size, and the number of international carriers it serves.

Black has not heard of Stratesec, but responds that for one company to handle security for both airports and airlines is somewhat unusual. It is also delicate for a security firm serving international facilities to be so interlinked with a foreign-owned company: “Somebody knew somebody,” he suggested, or the contract would have been more closely scrutinized.

Heightened WTC Security Alert Had Been Lifted

The World Trade Center was destroyed just days after a heightened security alert was lifted at the landmark 110-story towers, security personnel said. [September 11]. Daria Coard, 37, a guard at Tower One, said the security detail had been working 12-hour shifts for the past two weeks because of numerous phone threats. But on Thursday [September 6], bomb-sniffing dogs were abruptly removed. [NY NewsDay]

Pre-9/11 World Trade Center Power-Down

On the weekend of 9/8, 9/9 there was a ‘power down’ condition in WTC tower 2, the south tower. This power down condition meant there was no electrical supply for approx 36 hrs from floor 50 up… “Of course without power there were no security cameras, no security locks on doors and many, many ‘engineers’ coming in and out of the tower.” —

Coincidently , Marvin Bush was in New York on 9/11 —

Also, Larry Silverstein, who owned world trade centers, took out insurance for 3 point 5 billion dollars specifically in case of an act of “terrorrism” for his property.

Instead of renovation, Silverstein was rebuilding, funded by the insurance coverage on the property which ‘fortuitously’ covered acts of terrorism. Even better, Silverstein filed TWO insurance claims for the maximum amount of the policy, based on the two, in Silverstein’s view, separate attacks. The total potential payout is $7.1 billion, more than enough to build a fabulous new complex and leave a hefty profit for the Silverstein Group, including Larry Silverstein himself. As reported in The Washington Post, the insurance company, Swiss Re, has gone to court to argue that the 9/11 disaster was only one attack, not two and that therefore the insurance payout should be limited to $3.55 billion, still enough to rebuild the complex. AMERICA! ARE YOU STARTING TO GET THIS? —

Let’s listen to Silverstein himself as he admits that they decided to “Pull it” (referring to Trade Center 7)

So what did Larry Silverstein mean when he stated: “I said, ‘You know, we’ve had such terrible loss of life, may be the smartest thing to do is, is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse.” He could not have meant that they should “pull” the firefighters from the building because there weren’t any firefighters in the building, at least according to FEMA, NIST, and Frank Fellini, the Assistant Chief responsible for WTC 7 at that time. And if he meant “pull the firefighters” then why did he say “pull it”, with no reference to anything other than the building? The argument that “pull” is not used to mean “demolish” a building is belied by the other footage in the PBS documentary. And consider the timing: “they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse.” Could it really be possible that some (nonexistent) fire brigade was removed from the building and just at that moment (“then”) the building collapsed? Is there really any doubt here about what Silverstein meant?

The only reasonable conclusion is that Larry Silverstein’s statement is an admission that WTC 7 was brought down by a controlled demolition, meaning that the official version of what happened to WTC 7 is false, and casting serious doubt on the official story that terrorists of a foreign origin destroyed the twin towers, as well as on the rest of the official account of 9/11. Note that this admission is a statement against Silverstein’s own interests (putting him at odds with the official version of events and potentially jeopardizing his insurance claims). Such statements are given great weight as a matter of law.

Larry Silverstein, you may recall, is a reputed mobster who allegedly got his start in the sex services business and then oozed into real estate. Two months before 9/11, Silverstein finalized his 100-year-lease on the white elephant, condemned-for-asbestos World Trade Center complex and proceeded to double the insurance and hardball his insurers into changing the policy to “cash payout.”

On 9/11/01, Silverstein skipped his usual breakfast at the top of the North Tower. He says his wife reminded him of an appointment with his dermatologist. Other family members also stayed away, with other excuses. All of those who breakfasted there died. Silverstein and family survived. After confessing on national television to blowing up World Trade Center 7, Silverstein went to court and asked for and received double indemnity, including almost a billion dollars for WTC-7 the very building he had confessed to blowing up. Larry had the chutzpah to claim that there were two separate, unrelated terrorist attacks (the two planes) so he should get twice the money. Somehow that worked, presumably thanks to a mobbed-up judge. “Lucky Larry” walked away with more than five billion dollars, plus rights to rebuild.

But that wasn’t enough chutzpah for Larry. For the past several years he’s been back in court, asking for 11 billion dollars from the airlines’ insurers. Now Silverstein has somehow convinced AMR, the parent company of American Airlines, to give him a special dispensation. Even though AMR has filed bankruptcy, which theoretically should stop all lawsuits against it, the company’s attorneys have for unstated reasons chosen to insert a special rider into their bankruptcy agreement which allows Silverstein to continue suing the company.

According to the Wall Street Journal:

Silverstein’s company, which leased the Twin Towers and two other World Trade Center buildings from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, is seeking billions of dollars in damages for alleged negligence by the airline, according to the lawsuit. It is also seeking compensation for the lost rental income; the developer had signed 99-year leases for the space just two months before the attack. Lost rental income?! Larry, those Towers were condemned for asbestos! You would have had to spend many billions, probably double-digit billions, to scrape every bit of asbestos off the frames of those buildings to legally collect rental income. Not only that, but the Towers had a very high vacancy rate and antiquated communications infrastructure. New York City had been desperately seeking a way to demolish the Towers for at least a decade, but could not do so because of the asbestos. The WTC complex was a gigantic money-loser for the City, and it would have quickly bankrupted any private owner…had not a certain act of urban renewal by other means taken place on 9/11/01.

As if all that isn’t enough chutzpah, get this: Larry Silverstein used his 9/11 insurance fraud money to buy Chicago’s Sears Tower! How could Lucky Larry possibly top all of his previous acts of over-the-top chutzpah? Simple: He could blow up the Sears Tower, brag about it on national TV, and collect more double-digit billions in insurance money on the premise that it was somehow the fault of the Muslims. After all, Lucky Larry is on a winning streak. Will he roll the dice one more time?

So, here are the facts:


  • Bomb-sniffing dogs were inexplicably removed from the Twin Towers five days before 9-11

  • The Twin Towers had been evacuated a number of times in the weeks preceding 9/11
  • There was a power down in the Twin Towers on the weekend before 9/11, security cameras were shut down, and many workers ran around busily doing things unobserved (confirmed here)
  • A tenant of the World Trade Center hired a “sprinkler repairman” shortly before 9/11, and gave him access to 6 underground levels at World Trade Center building 1
  • And as an interesting coincidence a Bush-linked company ran security at the trade centers, thus giving it free reign to the buildings
  • The chief electrical engineer who wired the World Trade Centers (Richard Humenn) says that people working on the elevators could have planted explosives:
  • Mechanical engineer Gordon Ross, in his talk on the destruction of the Twin Towers, pointed out that:
  • “Those [core] columns which were situated adjacent to and accessible from inside the elevator shafts failed at an early stage of the collapse.
  • Those columns which were remote from the elevator shafts, and not accessible from the elevator shafts, survived the early stages of the collapse.”
  • Indeed, a top demolition expert says that with access to the elevator shaft, a team of loading experts would have access to the columns and beams:
  • According to USA Today: “On Sept. 11, ACE Elevator of Palisades Park, N.J., had 80 elevator mechanics inside the World Trade Center”.
  • NIST itself says that, on 9/11, “Elevators 6A and 7A were out of service for modernization”. (NIST NCSTAR 1-8, p.97).
  • In addition, Ace worked in and around structural steel:
  • A run of approximately 80 vertical feet, employed over 300 running feet of 2-1/2” x 8” and 2”x 2” trough raceway. This run traveled through plaster ceilings, concrete floors and around structural steel.
  • Indeed, there had been numerous elevator renovation and and asbestos removal projects in the 6 years prior to 9/11 which allowed access to core building structures, including:
  • 1995
  • 1997
  • 1998
  • 1998
  • 2000

These are just a few of the known, public examples of opportunities to plant bombs. There were undoubtedly many additional opportunities available to skilled operatives.

The four main facts:

1. Some of the steel structural columns of the World Trade Center towers, weighing 40 tons, were blasted sideways with such velocity that they stuck in the facades of other buildings hundreds of feet away. It’s impossible for a collapse caused only by fire and gravity to have done that. In fact it was done by explosives, which had to have been planted in the towers beforehand.

2. As the towers were destroyed, the line of disintegration descended at the rate of a free-falling object. If the cause of destruction had been “pancaking”,the weight of the rubble crushing each level in turn, as the government says, each intact level would have resisted the fall of the debris reaching it and slowed it down, below the speed of a free-falling object. Therefore, each level must have been blasted away before the rubble reached it.

3. Below ground level, huge puddles of metal were found that stayed liquid for a month (due to the thermal insulation of the rubble on top of them). Jet fuel is kerosene like charcoal starter fluid. When burning it never reaches the melting point of steel. The steel was melted by thermite—aluminum-powder incendiary enhanced with sulfur (which forms a lower melting-point compound with iron); the combination is called “thermite”. Since the steel members were box columns hollow inside the thermate powder was simply poured into them. When ignited it was held in place by the columns until it melted them.

4. Particles of unburned thermite have been found in the dust from the demolition of the towers, and these have now been thoroughly analyzed by physical and chemical methods. They are extremely small (0.2 – 3.0 mm) and thin (0.02 – 0.2 mm) chips, which could only have been made by very high-tech processes. It is absolutely impossible for this nano-thermite material to have been created by Osama bin Laden and “Al-Qaeda”. But it has been made by the U.S. government for use as a weapon.

The irrefutable conclusion: the World Trade Center was destroyed by explosives and incendiaries planted in the buildings. It was impossible for Arabs to get in and do that. (But the company that provided security for the WTC had Marvin Bush brother of George W Bush on its board of directors.)


The Illuminati, which is an informal term used today to refer to the global elite. They are the movers and shakers of this sinful world most of which are members of the occult. They control the central banks, top governments, the Supreme Court, wars, mainstream newsmedia, etc. Their official headquarters is the Council on Foreign Relations. Some members includes the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Rudolph Giuliani, the Bush family, Henry Kissinger, the DuPont family, and hundreds of others. All recent Presidents have been members. Nearly all White House staff have come from this woefully evil organization as well. These are the culprits behind the 911 attacks.

Amazingly, as America’s preachers are publishing tracts condemning the Muslim world as crazed bombers, not a word is being spoken, or a tract published, exposing the Satanic Bohemian Grove, where top U.S. government and corporation leaders attend every year to worship Satan. What is wrong with today’s preachers? 1st Timothy 6:10 gives us the answer… “For the love of money is the root of all evil…” The pastor who speaks the truth of these evils to his congregation is likely to end up in the poor house. 2nd Timothy 4:3 tells us why, “For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears.” The United States has deteriorated into an intolerant society, where people will only come to church if it is to their liking, and the message makes them feel good about themselves. Even our best pastors today refrain from touching upon certain taboo issues. Some Christian leaders are even teaching that it is sinful for U.S. citizens to cry aloud against the crimes being committed by our government.

An overwhelming amount of irrefutable evidence has been uncovered, including tons of disturbing facts that cannot be explained away, concerning the 911 attacks. The smoking gun of 911 is presidential directive w199-eye. To understand the motive behind this directive, one must look deeper into the Bush families partnership with the Carlyle Group in Saudi Arabia. Also, please view the documentary on the Bush Family Fortunes. The terrorist didn’t come from Iraq, they came from Saudi Arabia, friends of the Bush family. Please watch Illuminazi 911 (Free 1:23 hour startling video by Anthony J. Hilder). As you can clearly see, Islam is the least likely suspect in the 911 attacks. In fact, they are not suspects at all. The bizarre circumstances surrounding the collapse of World Trade Center building 7 is another smoking gun. There’s even a video of a BBC Reporter announcing that Building 7 had collapsed 20 minutes before it actually fell! This is irrefutable evidence of a government conspiracy against U.S. citizens.


Wake up America! Stop blaming the Muslims. The true culprits behind 911 needed a fall guy, i.e., someone to blame, so they chose Bin Laden. Al Qaeda is the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency, or as some have called it, Cocaine Import Agency). The Bush administration has committed more crimes against U.S. citizens than any other administration in history, from the anti-American Patriot Acts to the Inside Job of 911. For a detailed analysis of these evils, and many more, please read How Satan Turned America Against God; by Dr. William P. Grady; ISBN: 0-9628809-3-0.

Islam is the perfect scapegoat for a much greater evil at work in the world today—The Illuminati. I would also highly recommend the eye-opening book, The New World Order, by Ralph A. Epperson; 1990; ISBN: 0-9614135-1-4; publisher: PUBLIUS PRESS, Tucson, Arizona. The average person, Christians included, believe what they see and hear on the television (or should I say, Devilvision?). God has given us the truth today, but you have to DESIRE the truth first in order to search for it. It’s so much easier to just sit in front of the TV, listening to FOX LIARS, than it is to actually pick up a book and study for the truth. The New World Order is here; but sadly the average Christian today doesn’t even realize it, which is evidenced by the plethora of Christian leaders in America who genuinely think Islam was responsible for the 911 attacks.

So who is the real enemy?

Over 170 million people were slaughtered by governments during the 20th century. Ten million died in World War I and fifty million died in World War II. Of those who were killed during World War II, almost 70% were civilians. This so-called collateral damage was a consequence of the bombing by Britain and America. Then there was Korea, Vietnam, the Gulf War, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, a potential war in Iran and the unpublicized CIA wars. Yet, many citizens, rather than focusing on America’s brutality, claim that Islam is violent.

The Muslims are not the enemy. They don’t extort usury through the Federal Reserve; they aren’t manufacturing population-reducing vaccines and GMO seeds; they didn’t devise our abortion laws (about fifty million dead); they didn’t bail out the banks; they didn’t create the Department of Homeland Security and impose the PATRIOT Act; they aren’t wiretapping our private conversations or scanning us at the airport; they didn’t impose godless Communism on several countries and cause the death of millions of innocent people; they haven’t instituted the draconian healthcare laws; they have not orchestrated the nation’s economic crashes; they have not deindustrialized the nation and outsourced so many jobs; they haven’t wiped out the middle class by passing trade laws like NAFTA; and they haven’t foreclosed on thousands of homes; they are not the reason thousands of people live in tent cities.

Website Tracking

By J Monoco 09/09/2019 02:51 PM

Recent Comments

  1. Ivan wrote on 07/09/2009 06:06 PM

    All this evidence and experts views, for what? Where's a global debate in the media, nobody is answering these questions...i mean, we can write thousands of blogs like this, but there's no point if none of this is questioned and discussed widely...

  2. jimmy alley wrote on 09/12/2009 11:16 PM

    why ir bin laden still alive

  3. LORD REV DYJUAN D BARNES YAHWEH PH.D wrote on 12/07/2009 03:39 PM


  4. Walks-in-Storms wrote on 09/11/2010 09:40 PM

    Just curious, but how would the controlled demolition have been done? How could the miles (literally) of wire, thousands of switches, hundreds of chargess, the scores of personnel necessary, all the cutting and demolition necessary to place the charges, trucks, equipment and wherewithal have gone unobserved for the weeks that would have been required Why did no one report anything of the kind before, or after, the event? The tallest building ever brought down at the time of 9-11 was the Hudson Building in Detroit. It was 439 feet high and all of the logistics necessary for the demolition are on the Controlled Emoliton Inc. website. The link is http://www.controlled-demolition.com/jl-hudson-department-store EDITOR-----Apparently, you didn't read the article......we just told you how it was done!!!! By the way, it wouldn't have taken miles, thousands of switches (one radio controlled) or scores or personnel.....Why didn't anyone report it? If you were hired by the government to do this with the threat of your life if you talked, would you report it? And who would you "report" it to? Why didn't anyone report it? Would the people that did this report it ? Come on, use common sense!!!!!!!! Report it to whom? George Bush and the global elite and the people who did it? Get your mind away from CNN and ABC and think for yourself!.......You are a prime example of how people think-- and that's why a conspiracy like this can exist.

  5. Secres wrote on 10/08/2010 07:22 AM

    Why is Islam considered a false religion? It seems unfair for them. Plenty of research shows that they do not encourage hatred and killing. In fact, no religion does so.

  6. Joe Lanier wrote on 10/08/2010 11:54 AM

    Secres---No one claimed that Islam encourages hatred and killing. As a matter of fact we point out in this article that Islam and Muslims are NOT responsible for the events of 9/11.

  7. Buildreps wrote on 11/27/2014 10:22 AM

    Irrefutable proof that the Twin Towers are demolished in a very professional way http://buildreps.hubpages.com/hub/Twin-Towers-Why-Did-They-Collapse

Post Your Comment

Post comment