Quantcast

*(UPDATE)!* IS THIS WHAT AMERICA HAS COME TO? WHEN MISS CALIFORNIA IS VILIFIED FOR BELIEVING A MARRIAGE IS FOR A MAN AND A WOMAN!?

Views: 4576 | Comments: 1

Spinning Hot

If you’ve already been brain washed to believe that it is perfectly normal for two human beings of the same sex to have sexual relations and enjoy the fruits of marriage together, then read no further because I’ll probably just make you mad. However, if you understand that to build a house you need bolts and nuts to go together for your house to stand, and that men and women are created to go together by their very design, then read on.

To start with, I won’t even get into the spiritual or moral reasons why homosexuality doesn’t work but rather I’ll look at this issue from a logical and practical viewpoint.

Before I start, I want to point out that homosexuals are people (misguided people, but still people). I don’t believe they should be discriminated against (unless they are trying to force their agenda on others) and I certainly don’t believe society should tolerate any form of violence inflicted against them. From a Christian perspeective, we are all fallible humans who need Gods mercy. However, I don’t think America should stand by and let the “gays” force their own agenda on the rest of us. They are trying to put a gag order on anyone who would stand up and state the obvious…..And that is….. That the act of homosexuality is a perversion and is NOT in any way normal or healthy. Even animals understand that “Males” and Females” are what creation is all about. Find me ONE example of sustained homosexual sex even in the animal kingdom…..Let me save you some time..there isn’t any! That is not “Hate speech” but is just common sense. Miss California, Carrie Prejean was absolutely 100% correct in what she said and it is extremely unfair for anyone to be critical of how she answered her questions.

She said nothing negative toward homosexuals (as people), but was responding to a rather unfair and loaded question that was put out by enemies of Christians to trap her. As a matter of fact, she should have been applauded by her response!!!! And she would have been applauded and continues to be so by anyone who has a clue. It’s with this in mind, read on.

MISS CALIFORNIA, CARRIE PREJEAN SAID ON RECORD THAT MARRIAGE SHOULD BE BETWEEN A MAN AND A WOMAN. NOW SHE IS BEING PERSECUTED BY THE MEDIA WHO SAY THAT STATEMENT COST HER THE CROWN. HERE IS WHAT SHE SAID:

“I think that I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman,”

Now, that statement should be common sense for anyone who has even a basic knowledge of our anatomical structure and what physical parts fit where. But, apparently, her statement was not so well taken by the homosexual community who want to impose their “alternate” bizarre, perverted lifestyle on everyone else..

Carrie Prejean says Marriage should be between a man and woman to a mix of boos and applause and backlash by the mainstream media.

Many experts think her statement cost her the title of Miss America. Let us tell you Carrie, if your statement cost you the crown of Miss America, then it’s not a crown you wanted or needed anyway. You are too good for it.

You do NOT want to be Miss America of Sodom and Gomorrah, which is what they would have tried to make you if you had bowed down to their perverted “Gay” agenda. The reason the homosexual community made an issue out of what you said is because they don’t like or respect women or the real institution of marriage between a man and woman anyway…you are better off without their “crown”!!!!

SAD, BUT TRUE! Let me say something else on a personal level. NEVER IN MY LIFE DID I THINK I WOULD SEE THE DAY, IN AMERICA, WHEN A WOMAN, OR ANYONE ELSE, CAN SAY “MARRIAGE IS FOR A MAN AND A WOMANAND HAVE THAT STATEMENT COME UNDER QUESTION…How can any rational human being disagree with what she said?

Hummm, did it ever occur to people that think “homosexual sex” is the way to go, that no one would have ever been born if their own parents thought that way? Did it ever occur to people that homosexuals can’t reproduce and if everyone thought and lived like they do, that the world’s population would die out in one generation? Did it ever occur to people, that Carrie Prejean is right? This isn’t Rocket science people, this is just common sense.

Meanwhile, the cutting edge came up with this shocking report!

Christians need to mobilize on this issue right now. This Hate Crimes legislation is truly horrific.

NEWS BRIEF: “HATE BILL PASSES JUDICIARY COMMITTEE”,

“In a shocking conclusion to the second day of hearings on the federal hate crimes bill, HR 1913, The House Judiciary rejected the final amendment of Rep. Steve King (R, IA) that ‘sexual orientation’ in the bill specifically be defined as not including pedophiles …

They asserted that ‘sexual orientation’, as defined by the Hate Crimes Statistics Act of 1990, means consensual homosexual sex. That definition, it was claimed, is sufficient to exclude pedophiles. Before any one could respond in support of this bold and essential amendment, Judiciary Chairman Conyers cut off debate, calling for an immediate vote, which upheld Baldwin. When there were objections, Conyers said he had not noticed them wanting to debate Baldwin’s position, an absurd, unbelievable lie!”

The fact is that gays ever since the days of the Greeks have lusted after young boys as “consensual” partners.

“(In homosexual jargon, gay men are ‘chicken hawks’, boys ‘chickens’.) The promoters of HR 1913 are determined, at all costs, to protect the entire homosexual community as the primary beneficiaries of the hate bill. As we saw today, they were terrified of allowing opposition to fragment federal protection of homosexuals into ‘protected versus unprotected’ members. Such fragmentation would destroy their hate bill, dedicated to special protection of all homosexuals, regardless of degree of perversion. They do not want the pedophile members of NAMBLA (the North American Man-Boy Love Association) to be deprived of the same perks and protection under federal law enjoyed by homosexuals who cohabit only with adults. Homosexuals as a specific ‘class’ must remain inviolate.”

America is quickly degenerating into another Sodom and Gomorrah, and Christians must protest at all costs!!!!!!!!! You should be sickened by the below photo. IF YOU’RE NOT, THEN YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM! If you can’t understand that men are by their very design supposed to be with a women and that women, by their very design, should be with a man…then you are…let’s see how can we say it..Oh yea, THEN YOU ARE FLAT STUPID and shouldn’t be reading this website!!!!!

“Clearly, the House Judiciary Committee has now sent a powerful message that all deviant brands of homosexuality are welcome on the federal hate crimes bandwagon. No homosexual, whether he be into sado-masochism, bestiality, transvestism, necrophilia (sex with the dead), or pedophilia, should consider himself outside special protection. Experts in hate crime legislation now predict that any parent who physically restrains a homosexual pedophile attacking his or her child will become a federal hate criminal. Any young man who defends himself against a homosexual aggressively hitting on him will become guilty of the ‘hate crime’ of ‘bias-motivated assault’.”

So, if this bill passes, if someone like Miss California said she thinks “marriage should be between a man and a woman”, that will be classified as “Hate Speech” and she could be jailed for saying that. DO YOU SEE WHAT’S HAPPENING HERE?!

Here’s Carrie’s interview by Fox News:

“I have no regrets about answering [judge Perez Hilton] honestly,” she said in one of her first interviews following the show, where she answered that she was against gay marriage becoming legal in California. “He asked me for my opinion and I gave it to him. I have nothing against gay people and I didn’t mean to offend anyone in my answer.”

In her interview, Prejean talks about being “tested” by God, the outpouring of support, and the first thing she and her family did after the show. (Hint, it involves ketchup and mustard.)

FOXNews.com: How are you feeling today?

Carrie Prejean: Honestly, happy. This happened for a reason. By having to answer that question in front of a national audience, God was testing my character and faith. I’m glad I stayed true to myself.

FOXNews.com: Have a lot of people been trying to get in touch with you?

Carrie Prejean: Yes, lots of phone calls. I’ve gotten over 500 facebook friend requests, hundreds of messages from people I don’t know, saying how proud of me they are that I stood my ground. That made me the real winner of the night.

FOXNews.com: Did your stomach sink when you first heard you picked Perez Hilton’s question?

Carrie Prejean: I had a gut feeling. I knew he was controversial, and so was the question. Out of all the topics I studied up on, I dreaded that one, I prayed I would not be asked about gay marriage. If I had any other question, I know I would have won.

Related Stories Carrie Prejean Says Answer to Gay Marriage Question Cost Her Miss USA Crown FOXNews.com: Did you think right away your answer may have killed your chances of winning?

Carrie Prejean: Yeah, I thought I was going to be 4th runner up for sure. I was surprised I made it to first runner up!

FOXNews.com: Before “the question,” did you think you would win Miss USA?

Carrie Prejean: There was a lot of talk about me, people saying I was the frontrunner. During the whole two-week experience leading up to the pageant, I was very confident and relaxed. Not too nervous.

FOXNews.com: Were you sad you didn’t win? Did you go to the party afterwards, or go home and cry?

Carrie Prejean: No, I got together with my family. I ate my first hamburger in a long time!

FOXNews.com: Has the Miss Universe organization contacted you at all? What about your Miss California USA directors?

Carrie Prejean: I haven’t been told anything. I didn’t even see the Miss California directors after the pageant.

FOXNews.com: Are you upset that Perez Hilton called you a “b—ch” in his blog rant?

Carrie Prejean: Yes, but I have no regrets about answering honestly. He asked me for my opinion and I gave it to him. I have nothing against gay people, and I didn’t mean to offend anyone in my answer.

FOXNews.com: So what about Perez’s offer to take you out for coffee to “talk”?

Carrie Prejean: No comment!

Well, she might have been questioned at the contest..BUT I STAND UP AND APPLAUD HER!!!!

Lastly, if the hate bill threat has not moved you to pick up your phone and protest to Congress, the fact of HR 1913’s implicit protection of all deviant members of the gay community, including pedophiles, should cause you to react with outrage.

Please pick up your phone now to express outrage over this terribly offensive legislation. Christians no longer have the majority in Congress to derail this bill, nor do we have a President who will veto it. America is reflecting the true anti-Christian values pit into which we have sunk. This country has most definitely entered into the “As In The Days of Lot” category which Jesus said was one of the signs that the End of the Age is approaching, with its Antichrist close at hand.

Is this where this corrupt nation we call America has gone to? Had Miss California have condoned sodomy and lesbian lovers, she would have been applauded. But for her to say, that marriage is for a man and a woman…..She is now questioned? AMERICA!!! WAKE UP BEFORE EVERYONE TURNS INTO A PILLAR OF SALT!!!!!

THIS SHOULD BE AN OUTRAGE TO ALL AMERICANS!! YOU’RE 1ST AMMEDMENT RIGHTS FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS BEING THREATENED!! Please call your senator below!

CONTACT YOUR SENATORCONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVE

Updated Banner

5/15/09 THECONSPIRACYZONE UPDATE:

It looks like sites like ours is doing some good!!!! People are starting to let our government know they aren’t going to bow down to the gay agenda and their ridiculous “hate speech” legislation! Read this report from Thecuttingedge:

I. Has public pressure finally forced the White House to backtrack on its promises to the Gay/Lesbian agenda?

Or, are we simply seeing the outworkings of a strategic retreat so that the infamous ‘Hate Crimes’ bill can be passed?

NEWS BRIEF: “Unhitched! White House scrubs marriage promise: Obama’s pledge to homosexuals disappears from official agenda”, World Net Daily, May 12, 2009

“The White House has scrubbed President Obama’s central pledge to the homosexual community from its website – his promise to quash the federal Defense of Marriage Act. The president unveiled his pro-homosexual agenda on the White House website on Inauguration Day. Under the ‘Civil Rights’ section, he called for the repeal of the act signed by President Bill Clinton in 1996 after an overwhelming bipartisan vote in Congress (342-67 and 85-14). The Defense of Marriage Act provides that federal laws must be interpreted in accord with the traditional definition of marriage as the union of husband and wife.”

Therefore, the Gay/Lesbian community has always targeted the “Defense of Marriage Act” for destruction, as it strikes at the very heart of the homosexual agenda. President Obama pledged to get this law rescinded.

Now, it appears that his pledge is no longer his goal. His original strong language promising an end to the Defense of Marriage Act has now been replaced by a more general write-up. Even more interestingly is the White House’s change in the military policy toward gays.

“The White House also temporarily altered language promising to repeal the military’s ‘Don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy. The newly worded statement simply said the president ‘supports changing Don’t Ask Don’t Tell in a sensible way that strengthens our armed forces and our national security’.”

Has public pressure finally forced the Obama Administration team to backtrack its strident pro-gay policy? This last segment seems to suggest that this is the case.

“Peter LaBarbara, president of Americans for Truth questioned whether scrubbing the language means repealing the Defense of Marriage Act is now a low priority for the Obama administration. ‘We hope so, given that support for traditional marriage, between a man and a woman, remains strong throughout the country’, he said in a statement. ‘We hope that President Obama recognizes that his anti-DOMA pledge – like his radical campaign embrace of the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA), which would eviscerate pro-life laws restricting abortion across America – is not popular with mainstream voters, even if it was useful in rallying liberal Democratic activists during the campaign’.”

We would like to think that President Obama is actually changing his pro-gay policy in the face of consistent opposition from the majority of mainstream voters who steadfastly oppose gay marriage. However, we believe a more likely scenario is that the Obama Administration wants to conserve all its political capital on getting support for the “Hate Crimes” bill now working its way through Congress.

This next commentary article reveals just how onerous this whole “Hate Crimes” bill is. It actually offers legal protection for child pedophiles!

NEWS BRIEF: “Why I hate ‘hate crimes’ ”, by Joseph Farah, World Net Daily, May 13, 2009

“It’s called the ‘Matthew Shepard Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009’ ... As WND has reported, this one actually offers special protections for pedophiles who are targeted in crimes. Now, just imagine the horror you might feel as a parent if your child was violated by a child molester – someone who would testify in open court that he or she has an innate sexual predilection for kids. Before this bill was approved in the House, representatives tried to amend it to exclude pedophiles from the long list of sexual deviates it protects. – and at least one, Rep. Alcee Hastings, explicitly affirmed his desire to offer special protection for pedophiles.”

Liberals pushing this bill realize that its passage has to be carried out in the face of determined public opposition to doing anything to legalize homosexuality, and giving it the same legal standing as homosexuality.

But wait! Since this “Hate Crimes” bill protects child molesters, then it creates a special classification for the most onerous type of sexual crime. For the first time ever, a pedophile would be protected against normal legal punishment, whether the pedophile was gay or straight!

Therefore, what I think is occurring here is that the White House is leading a temporary retreat in supporting any other measure than the “Hate Crimes Bill”. The old adage of “biting off more than you can chew” comes to mind immediately.

This strategy would require an intense focusing on the Hate Crimes legislation. Once the “Matthew Shepard Act” is real law, then the White House can make another abrupt about-face and support these goals which it has now temporarily rescinded.

This retreat might also cause Conservative and/or Christian opposition groups to relax, thinking that President Obama does not have the support he needs to pass any gay legislation. We cannot relax our fight against the current “Hate Crimes” law!

UPDATE: MAY 26TH…It looks like more and more people are seeing what the real issue is here and are standing up to make a difference! KUDOS FOR CALIFORNIA VOTERS!!!!!

  • 12:56 PDT SAN FRANCISCO—California voters legally outlawed same-sex marriage when they approved Proposition 8 in November. —

The 6-1 decision upholding Prop. 8 was issued by the same court that declared a year ago that a state law defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman violated the right to choose one’s spouse and discriminated on the basis of sexual orientation.

Prop. 8 undid that ruling by reinstating the definition of marriage that the court had struck down, this time as an amendment to the state Constitution. The author of last year’s 4-3 decision, Chief Justice Ronald George, said today that the voters were within their rights to do so. (The full text of the decision can be read at www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/...nts/S168047.PDF.)

“All political power is inherent in the people,” George said, quoting the Declaration of Rights in the state Constitution.

George said voters have added “the sole, albeit significant, exception that the designation of ‘marriage’ is … now reserved for opposite-sex couples.” That was within their authority, he said, and any further change can come only at the ballot box.

The ruling, the court’s third major decision on same-sex marriage in five years, may be the last word from the state’s legal system on the issue. But the matter is far from settled in the political arena. Gay-rights advocates, anticipating the decision, have discussed putting another constitutional amendment on the ballot in 2010 or 2012 to try to repeal Prop. 8.

“Today’s decision is a terrible blow to same-sex couples who share the same hopes and dreams for their families as other Californians,” said Shannon Minter, legal director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, who argued the case before the court. “But our path ahead is now clear. We will go back to the ballot box and we will win.”

Backers of the measure were also looking ahead.

Prop. 8, which declared that only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California, passed with a 52 percent majority after an intense and expensive campaign. Sponsors, mainly affiliated with Christian conservative groups, raised nearly $40 million for the measure and opponents more than $45 million – combined, a record for a ballot measure on a social issue anywhere in the nation.

While the issue has gone back and forth between the court and the voters in California, same-sex marriage has been legalized by the Supreme Courts of Iowa and Connecticut and the legislatures of Vermont and Maine. Those states joined Massachusetts, whose high court issued the first such ruling in 2003. Similar legislation is pending in New Hampshire and New York.

California’s legal battle dates back to February 2004, when San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom authorized the city clerk to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Nearly 4,000 weddings took place in the next month before the state Supreme Court ordered a halt, then voided the marriages in August 2004 and found unanimously that Newsom had no authority to disregard state law.

The city and a number of couples quickly returned to court and sued to overturn the law. They won in Superior Court, lost in an appeals court, and won in the state’s high court on May 15, 2008 – but by then, their opponents had already submitted more than 1 million signatures qualifying Prop. 8 for the November ballot.

This time, the issue before the justices was whether the voters’ power to amend the Constitution by initiative.

Plaintiffs in the lawsuits were two groups of same-sex couples, some already married and some thwarted by Prop. 8, along with an array of local governments led by San Francisco. They argued that a measure eliminating fundamental rights exceeds the scope of a constitutional amendment and amounts to a revision, which needs a two-thirds legislative vote or approval from delegates at a state constitutional convention to reach the ballot.

PEOPLE, LET’S MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT IT. HOMOSEXUALITY IS NOT GODS PLAN! IF YOU DOUBT THAT, LOOK AT GOD’S URBAN RENEWAL PROGRAM FOR SODOM AND GOMORRAH. IT WAS DESTROYED! HOMOSEXUALITY IS NOT NORMAL—IT’S NOT HEALTHY AND DEFIES COMMON SENSE. DON’T LET THE HOMOSEXUAL ROCKEFELLER AGENDA ALONG WITH THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA TELL YOU ANYTHING DIFFERENT! THIS IS NOT HATE SPEECH, IT’S JUST COMMON SENSE. NOW, ASK YOURSELVES ONE QUESTION: THE HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA WILL FIGHT THIS ARTICLE TOOTH AND NAIL. THEY WILL LABEL IT AS “HOMOPHOBIC” AND A NUMBER OF OTHER TERMS. WHY ISN’T THEIR AGENDA LABELED AS “HATE SPEECH”? WHY AREN’T THE PEOPLE WHO LIBELED CARRIE PREJEAN ACCUSED OF “HATE SPEECH”? WHY ISN’T SODOMITE PEREZ HILTON WHO LABELED PREJEAN A “BITCH” ON HIS WEBSITE ACCUSED OF BEING A “HATER”? THE HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA HAS CALLED HER EVERYTHING FROM A “BITCH” TO A “HATER” AND ANYTHING ELSE “THEY” TERM AS APPROPRIATE BECAUSE SHE THINKS MARRIAGE IS FOR A MAN AND A WOMAN. IF ANYONE IS “HATING” THE TRUTH—IT’S THE “GAYS” AND THEIR AGENDANOT CARRIE PREJEAN…..WHY? IT’S BECAUSE IT’S THE 11TH HOUR AND THE IMMORAL NEW WORLD ORDER WANTS TO IMPOSE THEIR GOD HATING AGENDA ON EVERYONE ELSE!

EPH 5:11:DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE UNFRUITFUL DEEDS OF DARKNESS, BUT INSTEAD EXPOSE THEM;*


Did you find our site useful? Thank you for reading our free online articles? We want to say thank you!!! If we have been helpful, you can make donations to this site here to show your support.

THE CONSPIRACY ZONE is completely run on a voluntary basis. Your generous donation can certainly make a difference so we can continue to get the truth out.


Red Arrow Divider Red Arrow Divider

Custom Search

Lightning Flash 2


By Joe Monoco 04/21/2009 12:10 AM

Recent Comments

  1. Terry wrote on 05/10/2009 09:51 PM

    [It's still legal - and always God-honoring - to air messages like the following. (See Ezekiel 3:18-19.) In light of government backing of raunchy behavior (such offenders were even executed in early America!), maybe the separation we really need is the "separation of raunch and state"!] In Luke 17 in the New Testament, Jesus said that one of the big "signs" that will happen shortly before His return to earth as Judge will be a repeat of the "days of Lot" (see Genesis 19 for details). So gays are actually helping to fulfill this same worldwide "sign" (and making the Bible even more believable!) and thus hurrying up the return of the Judge! They are accomplishing what many preachers haven't accomplished! Gays couldn't have accomplished this by just coming out of closets into bedrooms. Instead, they invented new architecture - you know, closets opening on to Main Streets where little kids would be able to watch naked men having sex with each other at festivals in places like San Francisco (where their underground saint - San Andreas - may soon get a big jolt out of what's going on over his head!). Thanks, gays, for figuring out how to bring back our resurrected Saviour even quicker!

Post Your Comment





Post comment